|
Healthy environment versus healthy people
|  |  |  |
7 August 2002
Is it possible to eliminate poverty, without doing irreparable harm
to the world's environment? That's the challenge in front of the World
Summit for Sustainable Development in Johannesburg this month, a follow-up
to the groundbreaking Rio Earth Summit in 1992.
The Earth's population has more than doubled since 1950, from 2.5 billion
to 6 billion in 2000. In industrialised countries, people are living longer
and consume more than ever before. According to a report commissioned
for the Johannesburg summit, 15 percent of the world's population account
for 56 percent of the world's total consumption.
Meanwhile in low-income countries, the poorest 40 percent consume only
11 percent of resources used, and the average African household actually
consumes 20 percent less than it did 25 years ago. Clearly, if all six
billion of us consumed at the same rate as the 15 percent in industrialised
countries, the environment would suffer severely.
So the dilemma is this: How can the poorest people be lifted out of poverty,
without placing an unbearable strain on the Earth's resources?
sustainable development
According to the 1992 Earth Summit, the solution is sustainable development,
and it requires commitment from both industrialised and developing nations.
Sustainable
development has been defined as, "development which meets the
needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations
to meet their own needs." But it's a concept that's easier to talk
about than to achieve.
The Rio summit produced a comprehensive agenda for action ("Agenda
21"), but its implementation has been poor. At Johannesburg,
organisers hope to revive commitment to the agenda and achieve a new political
will to tackle the challenges of the new millennium. But whereas the priority
of Rio was on environmental protection, the focus of Johannesburg is expected
to be on poverty reduction.
More specifically, UN Secretary General Kofi Annan has called for the
summit to achieve progress in five main areas: water, energy, health,
agriculture and biodiversity. The outcomes of the Johannesburg conference
are likely to focus on these areas and will probably also be linked to
the Millennium
Development Goals.
what is new zealand's role
A recent report
by New Zealand's independent environment 'watchdog', the Parliamentary
Commissioner for the Environment, has heavily criticised New Zealand's
lack of action since the Rio Summit. New Zealand is in a strong position
to be a world leader in sustainable development, but has so far failed
to take up that opportunity.
New Zealand has prioritised economic growth over the environment, the
report says, and needs to shift its thinking toward 'development' rather
than growth at any cost: economic growth only recognises a limited sphere
of activity and is not representative of a healthy environment and society.
New Zealand's Minister for the Environment, Marian Hobbs and Prime Minister
Helen Clark will both attend the conference. New Zealand's focus is likely
to be on our own environment, rather than global issues and stepping up
New Zealand's efforts at tackling poverty in developing nations.
have your say
- Write a brief note to Helen
Clark or Marian
Hobbs. Tell them what you think New Zealand's contribution to the
Johannesburg conference should be. What do you hope the Conference can
achieve? What are your priorities?
- The Government also plans to put together a Sustainable Development
Strategy after the Conference, and release it for public comment. Keep
an eye out for this later in the year in the media and on the "Currently
Consulting" section of the Government
web site.
more information - general
Johannesburg Summit Homepage
Johannesburg Summit Fact
Sheets
EU
goals for the Summit
LEAD: an independent
site about the Johannesburg Conference
more information - new zealand
Creating
our future: Sustainable development for New Zealand
Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment's Report
Political comment on the Report: Labour,
Greens,
ACT
NZ Herald article

|